[ad_1]
The House on Wednesday voted against the idea of censuring and condemning Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., for insisting that former President Trump colluded with Russia to win the 2016 election.
In a 225-196 vote, lawmakers decided to set aside the censure resolution against Schiff, effectively killing it and preventing a vote on passage. The resolution introduced by Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, R-Fla., was opposed by 20 Republicans and two other GOP lawmakers voted “present” along with five Democrats.
The resolution was known to be on shaky ground with some Republicans. One expected “no” vote, Rep. Tom Massie, R-Ky., said he opposed the idea of a fine against Schiff – the resolution up today recommended a $16 million fine, but does not require it.
SCHIFF IMMEDIATELY STARTS FUNDRAISING OFF HOUSE GOP’S PUSH TO CENSURE HIM
U.S. Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., on Wednesday avoided being censured and condemned in the House for telling “lies” about Russia-Trump collusion. (Photo by Mario Tama/Getty Images)
“Adam Schiff acted unethically but if a resolution to fine him $16 million comes to the floor I will vote to table it. (vote against it),” he tweeted Wednesday.
“The Constitution says the House may make its own rules but we can’t violate other (later) provisions of the Constitution,” he added. “A $16 million fine is a violation of the 27th and 8th amendments.”
It wasn’t clear late Wednesday whether House Republicans might try again with a resolution against Schiff that leaves out all mentions of possible fines.
That resolution that failed on the House floor today said claims of Trump-Russia collusion were cooked up by Trump’s political opponents and pursued by the Department of Justice despite the lack of any solid foundation for suspecting collusion.
Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, R-Fla., introduced the resolution censuring Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif. (Fox News Digital/Jon Michael Raasch)
The resolution says the Democrats’ claims of collusion were “revealed as false” by “numerous” investigations, including Special Counsel John Durham’s probe into how the investigation into Trump was launched. It says that report, and reports from Special Counsel Robert Mueller and DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz, show that collusion “does not exist,” despite Schiff’s public claims to the contrary.
“By repeatedly telling these falsehoods, Representative Schiff purposely deceived his Committee, Congress, and the American people,” the resolution says.
“Representative Schiff lent credibility to the Steele dossier — a collection of debunked collusion accusations funded by President Trump’s political rivals — by reading false Steele allegations into the Congressional Record,” it says.
“Representative Schiff composed a false memo justifying the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrant application on Trump associate Carter Page, which Inspector General Horowitz later found was riddled with 17 major mistakes and omissions, provoking FISA Court Presiding Judge Rosemary Collyer to state unequivocally that the Federal Bureau of Investigation ‘mislead the FISC,’” it adds.
If the resolution passed, Schiff would have had to stand in the House well while the resolution language is read, and would have been subject to an Ethics Committee investigation. (AP Photo/Patrick Semansky)
“Representative Schiff used his position and access to sensitive information to instigate a fraudulently based investigation, which he then used to amass political gain and fundraising dollars,” it says. “The American taxpayers paid $32 million to fund the investigation into collusion that was launched as a result of Representative Schiff’s lies, misrepresentations, and abuses of sensitive information.”
If the resolution were to pass, it would formally censure and condemn Schiff’s actions for misleading the public “in a way that is not befitting” an elected member of the House.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
It would require Schiff to stand in the well of the House while the resolution is read in full.
And it would require an investigation into Schiff’s “lies, misrepresentations and abuses of sensitive information” by the House Committee on Ethics.
[ad_2]
Original Source Link